<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DigiSniper &#187; photo-manipulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digisniper.com/tag/photo-manipulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digisniper.com</link>
	<description>Shooting the pictures you WANT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pictures That Lie &#8211; Manipulation of Press/Media Pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/29/pictures-that-lie-manipulation-of-pressmedia-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/29/pictures-that-lie-manipulation-of-pressmedia-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media-photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo-editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo-manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photojournalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/29/pictures-that-lie-manipulation-of-pressmedia-pictures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was an uproar a while back about the media in Malaysia altering press pictures to make them more attractive or slightly change the meaning/context by removing/adding people or merging two pictures. It also happens to big shot AP photographers and many other press agencies, there is a full gallery that shows the extent of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was an uproar a while back about the media in Malaysia altering press pictures to make them more attractive or slightly change the meaning/context by removing/adding people or merging two pictures.</p>
<p>It also happens to big shot AP photographers and many other press agencies, there is a full gallery that shows the extent of the manipulation and the stories surrounding them. And it&#8217;s been happening for a long time.</p>
<p>Like this for example:</p>
<p>Trotsky&#8230;now you see him, now you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p><img width="500" src="http://i.n.com.com/i/ne/p/2006/lenin_550x167.jpg" alt="Trotsky" /></p>
<p>And this LA Times pictures which turned out to be a composite of two pictures to &#8216;improve the composition&#8217;.</p>
<p><img src="http://i.n.com.com/i/ne/p/2006/soldiers1_350x246.jpg" alt="Composite" /></p>
<p>In most of these cases the photographers were fired. I believe this is rightly so, in the case of media photography or photojournalism, you are taking the scene, the reality, what occurred, it&#8217;s not down to artistic interpretation or manipulation.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://news.com.com/2300-1026_3-6033210-1.html?tag=ne.gall.pg">News.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/29/pictures-that-lie-manipulation-of-pressmedia-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
