<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic FZ-8 Reviews &amp; Summary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digisniper.com/2007/04/26/panasonic-fz-8-reviews-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/04/26/panasonic-fz-8-reviews-summary/</link>
	<description>Shooting the pictures you WANT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intensecure</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/04/26/panasonic-fz-8-reviews-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-9802</link>
		<dc:creator>Intensecure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/04/26/panasonic-fz-8-reviews-summary/#comment-9802</guid>
		<description>As a former (as of today!) FZ30 owner, I think that Panasonic still have serious ground to cover to sort the noise issue.
My baby Canon A550 produces cleaner shots at ISO 800 than my my Pana did at 200. So when cleaned up, the Canon is vastly superior. And it&#039;s a cheap range P&amp;S.
Very wary of Panasonics after this expensive previous experience. Canon processing, however, just kicks ass~!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former (as of today!) FZ30 owner, I think that Panasonic still have serious ground to cover to sort the noise issue.<br />
My baby Canon A550 produces cleaner shots at ISO 800 than my my Pana did at 200. So when cleaned up, the Canon is vastly superior. And it&#8217;s a cheap range P&amp;S.<br />
Very wary of Panasonics after this expensive previous experience. Canon processing, however, just kicks ass~!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silencers</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/04/26/panasonic-fz-8-reviews-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-9271</link>
		<dc:creator>Silencers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/04/26/panasonic-fz-8-reviews-summary/#comment-9271</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see image samples at ISO 200 and higher. Past experience with FZ series give me chills whenever I have to kick up the ISO higher than 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see image samples at ISO 200 and higher. Past experience with FZ series give me chills whenever I have to kick up the ISO higher than 100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

