<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon Powershot G7 Review Round-Up &#8211; Not as Good as it Should Be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/</link>
	<description>Shooting the pictures you WANT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambrose</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-6530</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/#comment-6530</guid>
		<description>Sorry Shaolintiger, I don&#039;t have any experience with underwater photography.

As for GirlRobot, the most popular low light camera is the Fuji F31fd. It has amazing low light capabilities and has face detection too. 

This is the previous model reviewed on DPreview.com

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmf30/

Hope this helps!
Ambrose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Shaolintiger, I don&#8217;t have any experience with underwater photography.</p>
<p>As for GirlRobot, the most popular low light camera is the Fuji F31fd. It has amazing low light capabilities and has face detection too. </p>
<p>This is the previous model reviewed on DPreview.com</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmf30/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmf30/</a></p>
<p>Hope this helps!<br />
Ambrose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: girlrobot</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-6523</link>
		<dc:creator>girlrobot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 06:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/#comment-6523</guid>
		<description>any suggestions for a digital camera that&#039;s good for low light situations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any suggestions for a digital camera that&#8217;s good for low light situations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoblogging at Critical Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-6068</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblogging at Critical Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/#comment-6068</guid>
		<description>[...] Photoblogging    Posted By menj on February 26, 2007         Interesting that this blog should appear on PPS when I was thinking of what digital camera I should buy once I have hoarded enough cash to get one. I don&#039;t think I will go for a compact as I intend to do serious photography work via Ocular Perspectives (will be launched soon), so it will probably be a DSLR or at the very least a camera very close to the functions of a DSLR. This one looks interesting although I have been eyeing this one for some time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photoblogging    Posted By menj on February 26, 2007         Interesting that this blog should appear on PPS when I was thinking of what digital camera I should buy once I have hoarded enough cash to get one. I don&#8217;t think I will go for a compact as I intend to do serious photography work via Ocular Perspectives (will be launched soon), so it will probably be a DSLR or at the very least a camera very close to the functions of a DSLR. This one looks interesting although I have been eyeing this one for some time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/#comment-5980</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A:&lt;/strong&gt; That&#039;s a pretty oldskool camera.

&lt;strong&gt;Ambrose:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for the input! Have you had any experience with underwater photography, or have those in your group?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A:</strong> That&#8217;s a pretty oldskool camera.</p>
<p><strong>Ambrose:</strong> Thanks for the input! Have you had any experience with underwater photography, or have those in your group?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambrose</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-5979</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/#comment-5979</guid>
		<description>The G7 doesn&#039;t sound perfect on paper, however, once you use it, it comes up pretty close. I&#039;ve had mine for about 2 months now and absolutely love it. It responds quickly, is very compact, takes lovely pictures, has a great lens, takes great movies... 

Very little to complain about.

Ambrose
moderator of the G7 Yahoo group:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonG7/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The G7 doesn&#8217;t sound perfect on paper, however, once you use it, it comes up pretty close. I&#8217;ve had mine for about 2 months now and absolutely love it. It responds quickly, is very compact, takes lovely pictures, has a great lens, takes great movies&#8230; </p>
<p>Very little to complain about.</p>
<p>Ambrose<br />
moderator of the G7 Yahoo group:<br />
<a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonG7/" rel="nofollow">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonG7/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-5975</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/02/21/canon-powershot-g7-review-round-up-not-as-good-as-it-should-be/#comment-5975</guid>
		<description>its almost comprable to nikon 8400 i heard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its almost comprable to nikon 8400 i heard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

