<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus E-400 Announced the Smallest Digital SLR &#8211; 10 Megapixels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/12/olympus-e-400-announced-the-smallest-digital-slr-10-megapixels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/12/olympus-e-400-announced-the-smallest-digital-slr-10-megapixels/</link>
	<description>Shooting the pictures you WANT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/12/olympus-e-400-announced-the-smallest-digital-slr-10-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-5195</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 04:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/12/olympus-e-400-announced-the-smallest-digital-slr-10-megapixels/#comment-5195</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Albert Ng:&lt;/strong&gt; Yah I&#039;m kind of puzzled too, they seem to have released a few lenses than overlap lately with the existing kit lenses. I don&#039;t think their product innovation department has been doing well lately  in the SLR range at least, that&#039;s why I&#039;m a bit worried about their future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Albert Ng:</strong> Yah I&#8217;m kind of puzzled too, they seem to have released a few lenses than overlap lately with the existing kit lenses. I don&#8217;t think their product innovation department has been doing well lately  in the SLR range at least, that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m a bit worried about their future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/12/olympus-e-400-announced-the-smallest-digital-slr-10-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-5161</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2007/01/12/olympus-e-400-announced-the-smallest-digital-slr-10-megapixels/#comment-5161</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s strange that the kit lens is bigger and yet has less range (the E-500 kit lens is a 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 with 52mm filter thread, and its twin kit lens kit throws in a 40-150mm F3.5-4.5 with 52mm filter thread, brighter than the new lenses.) Also, they could&#039;ve thrown in Live View or CCD-shift to stand out (since Panasonic&#039;s Four Thirds approach probably means no lenses will be stabilized.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s strange that the kit lens is bigger and yet has less range (the E-500 kit lens is a 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 with 52mm filter thread, and its twin kit lens kit throws in a 40-150mm F3.5-4.5 with 52mm filter thread, brighter than the new lenses.) Also, they could&#8217;ve thrown in Live View or CCD-shift to stand out (since Panasonic&#8217;s Four Thirds approach probably means no lenses will be stabilized.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

