<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D40 &#8211; 6 Megapixel Entry Level dSLR &#8211; No Longer a Rumour!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/</link>
	<description>Shooting the pictures you WANT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/comment-page-1/#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kris:&lt;/strong&gt; It&#039;s only a very early preview, there won&#039;t be any samples out yet. I&#039;d say it&#039;d be very similar to the D50 output, perhaps slightly better though with the new algorithm from the D80.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kris:</strong> It&#8217;s only a very early preview, there won&#8217;t be any samples out yet. I&#8217;d say it&#8217;d be very similar to the D50 output, perhaps slightly better though with the new algorithm from the D80.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/comment-page-1/#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/#comment-2397</guid>
		<description>cant seems to find sample pix. You reckon i should change my FZ7 for this? dilema !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cant seems to find sample pix. You reckon i should change my FZ7 for this? dilema !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/comment-page-1/#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Albert:&lt;/strong&gt; Yah I found that kind of odd too, but then the cheap D lenses are primes, I guess this camera isn&#039;t aimed at prime users, the cheapest zoom lenses are G lenses. Might teach people a good lesson or two though having manual focus :)

&lt;strong&gt;calvaryzone:&lt;/strong&gt; Indeed, could be a big move in the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Albert:</strong> Yah I found that kind of odd too, but then the cheap D lenses are primes, I guess this camera isn&#8217;t aimed at prime users, the cheapest zoom lenses are G lenses. Might teach people a good lesson or two though having manual focus <img src='http://www.digisniper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>calvaryzone:</strong> Indeed, could be a big move in the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvaryzone</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/comment-page-1/#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>calvaryzone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>woh, if the street price is really sub 2k, then this calls for a celebration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woh, if the street price is really sub 2k, then this calls for a celebration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/comment-page-1/#comment-2345</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/11/23/nikon-d40-6-megapixel-entry-level-dslr-no-longer-a-rumour/#comment-2345</guid>
		<description>OOOH, the irony! The brightest cheap lenses are D and not G lenses. Imagine the fun that those on a tight budget will have with this and a 50mm F1.8D, without AF and all.

...unless Nikon makes a bright G lens, which presumably would be made wider because the rear element can be closer to the focal plane. 24mm F1.8G anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOOH, the irony! The brightest cheap lenses are D and not G lenses. Imagine the fun that those on a tight budget will have with this and a 50mm F1.8D, without AF and all.</p>
<p>&#8230;unless Nikon makes a bright G lens, which presumably would be made wider because the rear element can be closer to the focal plane. 24mm F1.8G anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

