<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An 18-200mm Zoom? Ultimate Lens? The Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/</link>
	<description>Shooting the pictures you WANT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/comment-page-1/#comment-5146</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/#comment-5146</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;moo_t:&lt;/strong&gt; Well more like a saving of around RM800-1000 which is quite a lot and enough to get another decent lens with the difference or a flash like the SB-600. Of course that&#039;s only if the Sigma optical quality stands up to the Nikkor. Like I chose the Tamron 90mm SP Di Macro lens over the Nikkor 105mm VR Micro lens as it&#039;s half the price and just as sharp, but without the VR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>moo_t:</strong> Well more like a saving of around RM800-1000 which is quite a lot and enough to get another decent lens with the difference or a flash like the SB-600. Of course that&#8217;s only if the Sigma optical quality stands up to the Nikkor. Like I chose the Tamron 90mm SP Di Macro lens over the Nikkor 105mm VR Micro lens as it&#8217;s half the price and just as sharp, but without the VR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moo_t</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/comment-page-1/#comment-5140</link>
		<dc:creator>moo_t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/#comment-5140</guid>
		<description>Nikor 18-200mm F3.5-5.6 VR only cost ~RM2600-RM2800. Saving few hundreds bucks for 3rd party lens is not a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikor 18-200mm F3.5-5.6 VR only cost ~RM2600-RM2800. Saving few hundreds bucks for 3rd party lens is not a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gene:&lt;/strong&gt; Yah I agree, it should be around RM2200 I would guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gene:</strong> Yah I agree, it should be around RM2200 I would guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genedavinci</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>genedavinci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a good alternative for neekon 18-200mm VR. I am expecting the price to be around 2k. the normal sigma 18-200mm is priced at rm1.5k thus i don&#039;t think they will be around 1500-2000 margin. my best bet would be rm1900 - rm2200.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a good alternative for neekon 18-200mm VR. I am expecting the price to be around 2k. the normal sigma 18-200mm is priced at rm1.5k thus i don&#8217;t think they will be around 1500-2000 margin. my best bet would be rm1900 &#8211; rm2200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/#comment-945</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;KY:&lt;/strong&gt; Yeah it&#039;s actually &quot;Four Thirds&quot; but I&#039;m lazy to type it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>KY:</strong> Yeah it&#8217;s actually &#8220;Four Thirds&#8221; but I&#8217;m lazy to type it <img src='http://www.digisniper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KY</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>KY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 03:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/#comment-944</guid>
		<description>you meant 4/3? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you meant 4/3? <img src='http://www.digisniper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/#comment-942</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Albert:&lt;/strong&gt; I did wonder what would happen if you put an image stabilised lens on a stabilised body, would they work together, or counteract each other? Might be interesting, lens stabiliser and CCD stabiliser together. Or it might be a disaster! Usually Sigma releases for Canon and Nikon but they have started released 3/4 mount lenses for some models. Wasn&#039;t that impressed by the Nikon tbh, will wait and see how this performs, if it&#039;s half the price but same performance then it might impress me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Albert:</strong> I did wonder what would happen if you put an image stabilised lens on a stabilised body, would they work together, or counteract each other? Might be interesting, lens stabiliser and CCD stabiliser together. Or it might be a disaster! Usually Sigma releases for Canon and Nikon but they have started released 3/4 mount lenses for some models. Wasn&#8217;t that impressed by the Nikon tbh, will wait and see how this performs, if it&#8217;s half the price but same performance then it might impress me <img src='http://www.digisniper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/10/03/an-18-200mm-zoom-ultimate-lens-the-sigma-18-200mm-f35-63-dc-os/#comment-927</guid>
		<description>It might just be a good grab for those unable to find the elusive Nikkor 18-200 VR. :D

This has got me gaping too. There is no clear literature as to what mounts it supports, since Sigma generally makes for many mounts, but imagine putting that on a Sony A100/Pentax k100d! I wonder how many stops can be shaved in total.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might just be a good grab for those unable to find the elusive Nikkor 18-200 VR. <img src='http://www.digisniper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This has got me gaping too. There is no clear literature as to what mounts it supports, since Sigma generally makes for many mounts, but imagine putting that on a Sony A100/Pentax k100d! I wonder how many stops can be shaved in total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

