<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Canon Powershot A710 IS &#8211; First review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/</link>
	<description>Shooting the pictures you WANT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Powershot G7 Review Round-Up - Not as Good as it Should Be &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5972</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Powershot G7 Review Round-Up - Not as Good as it Should Be &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-5972</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m leaning towards the more versatile (And cheaper) Canon Powershot A710 IS though, with the underwater casing it comes in at around RM1900. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m leaning towards the more versatile (And cheaper) Canon Powershot A710 IS though, with the underwater casing it comes in at around RM1900. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Coolpix S10 VR - A Look at the Reviews &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5367</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Coolpix S10 VR - A Look at the Reviews &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-5367</guid>
		<description>[...] I was quite interested in this camera, the first Nikon compact with VR (their name for image stabiliser or Vibration Reduction), I thought it could be a competitor for the one I have my eye on, the Canon Powershot A710 IS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was quite interested in this camera, the first Nikon compact with VR (their name for image stabiliser or Vibration Reduction), I thought it could be a competitor for the one I have my eye on, the Canon Powershot A710 IS. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Issues Warning for Overheating Batteries for PowerShot A530 and A540 &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5196</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Issues Warning for Overheating Batteries for PowerShot A530 and A540 &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-5196</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ll have to think twice about the Canon Powershot A710 IS after all.. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ll have to think twice about the Canon Powershot A710 IS after all.. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casio Exilim Hi-Zoom EX-V7 with 7x Zoom and 7.2 Megapixels &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5137</link>
		<dc:creator>Casio Exilim Hi-Zoom EX-V7 with 7x Zoom and 7.2 Megapixels &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-5137</guid>
		<description>[...] Looks good to me, that&#8217;s for sure! It might be a good choice over the Canon Powershot A710 IS as this camera has similar features and manual controls but is much more compact and has a little bit of extra zoom. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Looks good to me, that&#8217;s for sure! It might be a good choice over the Canon Powershot A710 IS as this camera has similar features and manual controls but is much more compact and has a little bit of extra zoom. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Canon A710 IS WILL Be Released in Malaysia &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>The Canon A710 IS WILL Be Released in Malaysia &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-874</guid>
		<description>[...] After I read about the Canon A710 IS not being released in malaysia over at Sunflower&#8217;s place, I was a bit worried as I have my eye on this camera. To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:27 PM Subject: RE: Customer Enquiry/Feedback@xxxxxxx (30332) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After I read about the Canon A710 IS not being released in malaysia over at Sunflower&#8217;s place, I was a bit worried as I have my eye on this camera. To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:27 PM Subject: RE: Customer Enquiry/Feedback@xxxxxxx (30332) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tien Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Tien Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-757</guid>
		<description>hm.. well, I have no idea about the code name of the error of design flaw hehe. Just something I read about A700, which has zoom lens easily attracting grit. Just wonder if this issue persists in A710 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm.. well, I have no idea about the code name of the error of design flaw hehe. Just something I read about A700, which has zoom lens easily attracting grit. Just wonder if this issue persists in A710 <img src='http://www.digisniper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-756</guid>
		<description>The E18 is old news; I got that once on my A520, but I just took out the batteries, popped them back in, and it automatically pulled the lens back in. Same goes for a Nikon Coolpix 4400 that had the same problem. I think digicams circa 2005 don&#039;t have that problem anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The E18 is old news; I got that once on my A520, but I just took out the batteries, popped them back in, and it automatically pulled the lens back in. Same goes for a Nikon Coolpix 4400 that had the same problem. I think digicams circa 2005 don&#8217;t have that problem anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaolinTiger</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaolinTiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-755</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Albert:&lt;/strong&gt; Yah that&#039;s a decent metric. Yah I saw Canon has announced a few new models with Digic III but they are all Ixus so far I think. Should get more details at Photokina. I guess this one came into production before the Digic III was ready. Canon still hasn&#039;t had anything near the quality of the Sony R1 yet, they seem so be playing safe with Superzoom and the G series died off as it could be killing 300D sales in that time.

&lt;strong&gt;Tien Soon:&lt;/strong&gt; Do you mean the dreaded E18 error where the zoom can&#039;t fold up correctly back into the camera? I had that before on my A70 and had to have the lens replaced..The E18 issue did put me off the A700 aswell, I&#039;ve had no news about design changes on the A710 though so I will be checking it out as it&#039;s been a long standing design flaw with the A-series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Albert:</strong> Yah that&#8217;s a decent metric. Yah I saw Canon has announced a few new models with Digic III but they are all Ixus so far I think. Should get more details at Photokina. I guess this one came into production before the Digic III was ready. Canon still hasn&#8217;t had anything near the quality of the Sony R1 yet, they seem so be playing safe with Superzoom and the G series died off as it could be killing 300D sales in that time.</p>
<p><strong>Tien Soon:</strong> Do you mean the dreaded E18 error where the zoom can&#8217;t fold up correctly back into the camera? I had that before on my A70 and had to have the lens replaced..The E18 issue did put me off the A700 aswell, I&#8217;ve had no news about design changes on the A710 though so I will be checking it out as it&#8217;s been a long standing design flaw with the A-series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tien Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Tien Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-748</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read a number of complaints about Canon A700 on its bad zoom seals, and zoom lens easily attracting grit. Do you have any idea if this issue is resolved in A710 IS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a number of complaints about Canon A700 on its bad zoom seals, and zoom lens easily attracting grit. Do you have any idea if this issue is resolved in A710 IS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digisniper.com/2006/09/20/new-canon-powershot-a710-is-first-review/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>I think in general, a camera has good noise if you can work with one stop lower than its maximum ISO. ISO200 on my A520 can be comfortably worked with, and same holds true on the ISO400 shots on the A700 and S3IS I&#039;ve seen.

DiGiC III should be interesting too, with its 1024x768 at 15fps video and ISO1600. I&#039;d expect a workable ISO800 out of Canon. Sadly, the G7 has a darker F2.8-4.8 compared to the G6&#039;s F2.0-3.0, and the only other cameras with DiGiC III announced are Ixuses!

If they had DiGiC III on a manual zoom ultrazoom with hotshoe, they&#039;d kill their budget SLR sales. They seem to have dropped out of that market since the Pro1. But then they don&#039;t have anything cheaper than a 350D, so why not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in general, a camera has good noise if you can work with one stop lower than its maximum ISO. ISO200 on my A520 can be comfortably worked with, and same holds true on the ISO400 shots on the A700 and S3IS I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>DiGiC III should be interesting too, with its 1024&#215;768 at 15fps video and ISO1600. I&#8217;d expect a workable ISO800 out of Canon. Sadly, the G7 has a darker F2.8-4.8 compared to the G6&#8242;s F2.0-3.0, and the only other cameras with DiGiC III announced are Ixuses!</p>
<p>If they had DiGiC III on a manual zoom ultrazoom with hotshoe, they&#8217;d kill their budget SLR sales. They seem to have dropped out of that market since the Pro1. But then they don&#8217;t have anything cheaper than a 350D, so why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

