Altering Reality
I start this post with a couple of pictures. The first photo was how the sky looked like in the evening, processed from the RAW file with minimal adjustments. The second is the photo after some level tweaks in Adobe PS. Which catches your eye more?
This brings me to the thoughts where photographs can be altered for various reasons. I am not posting this to start a debate on what is right and what is not but you can feel free to share with us your thoughts on this.
Since the dawn of photography, some photographers have strived to change reality pre and post exposure. Salon photographers pay cyclists to cycle in the sunset to capture their silhouttes and they also pay old men to dress up as monks so that they could be interesting subjects. Today, in the digital realm, the manipulation of reality is more prevalent with tools like Adobe PS being ubiquitous and graphics artists use such tools as tool to create fantastical creations.
The only stance I take firmly is if a photograph, used for purposes of documentation, is altered. I do not agree to this.
Related Posts:
- Pictures That Lie - Manipulation of Press/Media Pictures
- First Look at the Sony A900 Full Frame 24 Megapixel dSLR
- Extensive Olympus E-3 dSLR Review Released - Flashship 10 Megapixel
